![]() Height groups by quartile were significantly different and scores increased with height, especially in toes-to-finger methods. Interaction of method with subject characteristics was significant for age, height, and base of support only. RESULTS: Measurement method and style of reach showed a significant interaction. Five subject variables were analyzed for interactions among the methods and groups defined by subject characteristics. Effects of measurement method (from finger-to-finger or from toe-to-finger) and style of reach (1 or 2 arms) were investigated. METHODS: Eighty subjects aged 7 to 16 years were tested. ![]() Height categories may be more useful when using the test for discriminative purposes, especially with toes-to-finger methods.ĪB - PURPOSE: Functional Reach Test scores were examined for the effects of traditional and alternate methods and subject characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: Functional Reach Test scores were affected by method of reach and method of measurement. ![]() N2 - PURPOSE: Functional Reach Test scores were examined for the effects of traditional and alternate methods and subject characteristics. T1 - Factors affecting functional reach scores in youth with typical development
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |